21 MayGoSL keeps Tissainayagam locked up

Media Release: Sri Lanka

IFJ Urges Speedy Processing of Tissainayagam’s Pardon

May 17, 2010

The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) urges Sri Lanka’s Government to speed up its processing of a full and unconditional presidential pardon for senior Tamil journalist J.S. Tissainayagam.

On May 3, World Press Freedom Day, Sri Lanka’s Minister for External Affairs, G.L. Peiris, reportedly told a press conference that President Mahinda Rajapaksa would pardon Tissainayagam, who was sentenced last year to 20 years’ jail on accusations of terrorism-related activities.

On May 11, Attorney-General Mohan Peiris said that the pardon would be granted swiftly on the condition that Tissainayagam’s appeal against his conviction and sentence was simultaneously withdrawn, according to the local Daily Mirror. The Mirror also reported that the Attorney-General was to process the pardon during the week ending Friday, May 14.

However, two weeks after the announcement of a pardon, the details and any conditions remain unknown. There has been no official confirmation of when all necessary judicial procedures will be enacted to formally issue the pardon and fully restore Tissainayagam’s rights.

“Sri Lanka’s President and Attorney-General must provide a clear and transparent timeline for when Tissainayagam’s unconditional pardon and full restoration of rights will be enacted,” IFJ General Secretary Aidan White said.

Tissainayagam was initially detained in March 2008. He was held for more than five months until being charged in August 2008 under counter-terror and emergency laws. He was accused of attempting to cause racial or communal disharmony through his articles on human rights issues published in the North-Eastern Monthly in 2006 and 2007.

Tissainayagam was convicted on August 31 last year to 20 years’ rigorous imprisonment under Sri Lanka’s draconian counter-terror and emergency laws. It was one of the harshest sentences ever imposed on a journalist in a democratic country, on the basis of the content of their professional work.

Tissainayagam was granted bail in January this year while awaiting appeal. While no longer held in the notoriously dangerous Magazine prison, there are continuing concerns for his safety.

The IFJ calls on the international community and press freedom advocates to maintain their commitment and attention to Tissainayagam’s case to ensure that Sri Lanka’s Government lives up to the promise of a full pardon and restoration of Tissainayagam’s rights.

For further information contact IFJ Asia-Pacific on +612 9333 0919

The IFJ represents over 600,000 journalists in 125 countries worldwide

05 MayGoSL’s persecution of those that report truth

From Tamil Justice: All, following Gotabhaya Rajapakse’s appearance again as a predator on RSF’s list during press freedom week – the true terror wielded by the Sri Lankan Government still, 1 year after the end of the armed conflict and in a so-called time of “peace” is frightening.  And, this is the country Rudd wants to send back the persecuted minority to. Shame on him. Read more on the perils of attempting to report the truth in SL and the daily fear progressive and truth-seeking journalists live with of vanishing into a tortured oblivion. Big Brother truly does exist and he has created a hell hole from which there is little escape.

ABC – Press Freedom: A reminder of our liberties

by Mark Scott

Journalism can be one of the most dangerous occupations. Even for those not dodging bullets in war zones. World Press Freedom Day is an appropriate time for media organisations like the ABC – and the wider public – to contemplate the terrible sacrifices made by reporters around the world in carrying out their daily work.

We often pay lip service to the notion of reporting “without fear or favour”. In many countries, even some of those not carrying the adjective “troubled”, shining a light on public maladministration or malfeasance can bring repercussions – some very fearful.

In these places, news bulletins are rudely shelved for scripts written in government offices. Editors sacked for refusing to toe official lines. Reporters detained, bashed or even killed.

World Press Freedom Day was started by the UN General Assembly in 1993. It aims to remind people, governments and institutions of what a free press means for a society and a nation. How it strengthens democracy and contributes to development throughout the world.

Each year however, it also reminds me how secure and large our liberties are, relative to other nations that are less lucky. At a Commonwealth Broadcasting forum a couple of weeks ago, I heard heads of various media organisations from Jamaica, Pakistan and Sri Lanka speak about media freedom in the Commonwealth.

The freedom they experience is sometimes absent, often limited or tenuous.

Sri Lanka has lived through over 30 years of civil war. Press freedom is seriously compromised.

Every journalist in Sri Lanka knows their work will be scrutinised by a government that is unburdened by the concepts of editorial independence or accountability.

Opposition voices have been minimised, or silenced. Journalists have been killed, detained or disappeared.

The journalist’s duty to inform is seen exclusively through the prism of self-interest by those in power.

As if to prove this point, on 23rd April Mervyn Silva, a politician with an established record of physical and verbal violence against journalists, was appointed Deputy Minister of Information within the Sri Lankan government. When self-preservation is at stake, how difficult must it be for any journalist to avoid pre-emptive self-censorship? More

28 AprRSF – GoSL’s thugs kidnap journalists

Reporters Without Borders/Reporters sans frontières 26 April 2010

*SRI LANKA- Gang boss known for hostility towards journalists appointed deputy media minister*

“In what country do you appoint an arsonist to put out fires?” Reporters Without Borders asked today after learning that Mervyn Silva, a politician notorious for insulting and physically attacking journalists, has been appointed deputy minister of media and information. Labour minister in the last government, Silva was confirmed in his new post by parliament on 23 April.

“The Sri Lankan government has against distinguished itself by assigning key posts to very controversial figures implicated in attacks on press freedom,” Reporters Without Borders said. “The ruling party’s victory in the parliamentary elections is being marred by this kind of appointment, which is casting serious doubt on its ability to carry out reconciliation and reconstruction.”

The press freedom organisation added: “We call on Prime Minister D. M. Jayaratne to relieve Mervyn Silva of his ministerial post.”

Silva’s appointment comes at a time of considerable hostility towards press freedom. The defence secretary (who is the president’s brother) put a great deal of pressure on TV stations and websites not to provide live coverage of opposition leader Sarath Fonseka’s speech at the opening of the new parliament on 22 April.

In the event, no TV station broadcasted live the speech delivered by Fonseka, who was let out of prison to attend the inauguration because he won a seat in the parliamentary election. A former army commander, Fonseka has been detained after last January’s presidential election, in which he was the leading opposition candidate.

Several newspapers reported his speech on their websites, but did not publish any photos of him in their print editions. “When such pressure comes from the defence ministry, we have no choice but to not publish, or else we will be risking closure,” a Colombo-based journalist told Reporters Without Borders on condition of anonymity.

Threats forced several Sri Lankan journalists to flee the country during the campaign for the 8 April parliamentary elections. Later, a team working for the Colombo-based /Daily Mirror/ newspaper was followed and threatened on 21 April in the central city of Kandy by a local journalist apparently acting on the orders of the police. Journalists had gone there to cover a re-poll.

A ruling party candidate threatened *Wasantha Chadrapala*, a correspondent for various media in the eastern district of Ampara, on 4 April because of his coverage of the election campaign. His house was attacked by unidentified assailants that evening.

There is still no news of *Prageeth Eknaligoda*, a reporter and cartoonist who has been missing since 24 January:

http://en.rsf.org/sri-lanka-cartoonist-kidnapped-two-months-23-03-2010,36823.html
<ttp://en.rsf.org/sri-lanka-cartoonist-kidnapped-two-months-23-03-2010,36823.html%22>

Opposition journalist *Ruwan Weerakoon* is meanwhile still being held although he is in very poor health:
http://en.rsf.org/sri-lanka-anti-terrorist-police-arrest-18-03-2010,36782.html
<ttp://en.rsf.org/sri-lanka-anti-terrorist-police-arrest-18-03-2010,36782.html%22>

Finally, the government has ordered all journalists, newspaper editors and media owners to submit a declaration of possessions by 30 March.

*/Information about Mervyn Silva/*

A staunch supporter of President Mahinda Rajapksa, Mervyn Silva is above all known for organising various physical attacks on news media while labour minister, and for his verbal attacks on independent journalists. In December 2007, he led an assault on the headquarters of
the state TV station /SLRC/ and was forcibly expelled from the building. At least five of the station’s employees were physically attacked in the weeks that followed – some of them sustaining serious stab wounds – presumably to punish them for humiliating Silva.

Silva and his men assaulted several journalists, including a /BBC/ correspondent, during a peaceful meeting near Colombo in 2007.

In March 2008, Silva supporters threatened a /Sirasa TV/ crew that went to do a report about a bridge being in Kelaniya, near Colombo. “This time I lift a finger but the next time I will lift a hand if you come back,” Silva told the journalists. The following month, Silva’s thugs threatened photographers from the /Daily Mirror/ and /Daily Lankadeepa/newspapers who were covering an inauguration.

More information about Silva’s hostility towards the media:
http://en.rsf.org/spip.php?page=ticle&id_article&001
http://en.rsf.org/spip.php?page=ticle&id_article 939
http://en.rsf.org/spip.php?page=ticle&id_article%240
http://en.rsf.org/spip.php?page=ticle&id_article&259

Vincent Brossel
Asia-Pacific Desk
Reporters Without Borders
33 1 44 83 84 70
asia@rsf.org <Mailto:asia@rsf.org>

22 AprSL’s Sinhala Nationalism & Tamil persecution

Inside Story – Sri Lanka: anatomy of a tragedy

The belief that conditions in Sri Lanka have fundamentally changed is wishful thinking, write Stephen Keim and Roshan de Silva Wijeyeratne in this account of the country’s ongoing conflict

THE RESULT of the Sri Lankan general election on 8 April came as no surprise. The ruling United People’s Front Alliance won a strong majority of votes cast and is likely to hold 138 seats in a 225-member parliament. While this tally falls twelve seats short of the two-thirds needed to amend the constitution, it seems likely that President Mahinda Rajapakse and the leaders of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party, the dominant element in the governing Alliance, will be able to secure the necessary numbers by persuading parliamentarians from the opposition United National Party to defect to the government. Concomitant with the Alliance’s triumph has been the near annihilation of the Sinhalese dominated Peoples Liberation Front, a socialist-nationalist party with nearly thirty seats in the previous parliament, whose core agenda, the defence of the centralised state, has been appropriated by the Alliance.

Those Tamils who actually went to the polling stations voted either for the federalist Tamil National Alliance or for President Rajapakse’s Tamil client party, the Eelam Peoples Democratic Party. The vote for the latter was purely strategic: under the island’s proportional representation system these Tamils gave their second preference votes to a party which – as part of the governing Alliance – could claim to be in a position to secure national resources for the devastated northeast of the island. If the party fails to secure such resources then its collaboration with the Sri Lankan/Sinhalese state is likely to be rejected by Tamils at the next election. More

09 Feb100 SL journos protest against the govt

The Canadian Press – 100 Sri Lankan journalists protest government for alleged moves to suppress media workers

Sri Lankan journalists who claim the government has stepped up its suppression of the media in recent weeks staged a protest Monday and demanded the release of a detained editor from a pro-opposition newspaper.

Colombo Page – * Sri Lankan journalists protest against media suppression

Nidhasana News – Sri Lankan Journalists Protests Government for Suppression

Hundreds of journalist protested today (08) in Colombo against suppression of government.

The agitation was organized to protest against detention of Chief Editor of “Lanka” newspapers Chandana Sirimalwatta without any charges and abducting “LankaeNews” journalist Prageeth Eknaligoda.

“If Mahinda Rajapaksa won the presidential election genuinely, why does he afraid of media?” protesters asked. The media would stop writing against the government only when a good governance san fraud and corruption is established in the country states, protesters said further.

Meanwhile New-York based Human Rights Watch said since the election authorities have detained and questioned several journalists and blocked news Web sites. At least one reporter has been assaulted and several have been threatened.

31 JanPost-Election crackdown on journos

Human Rights Watch (29/01) – Sri Lanka: End Harassment, Attacks on Journalists

The Sri Lankan government should immediately end its post-election harassment of media outlets and ensure protection of journalists from attack, Human Rights Watch said today.

SMH – Sri Lanka ‘expels Swiss reporter’

Swiss Info – Swiss journalist told to leave Sri Lank

The Straits Times – Sri Lanka expels Swiss reporter

SRI Lankan authorities have withdrawn the visa granted to a Swiss reporter covering the island’s fiercely fought presidential vote and asked her to leave the country within 48 hours.

Sify – Anti-government newspaper shuttered in Sri Lanka

Times of India – Police seal office of ‘Lanka‘ newspaper

23 JanElection lead up: Today’s news

SMH – A democracy in doubt

by Matt Wade

Whoever wins next week’s election, the military will have the upper hand, Matt Wade writes from Colombo.

A helicopter overhead announced that the President had arrived. A packed stadium at Homagama, in south-western Sri Lanka, erupted as Mahinda Rajapaksa did a fly-past before landing.

Dressed in his trademark white tunic, sarong and red scarf, he was soon on the dais, ready to open the sports ground – named, of course, after himself.

With presidential elections next week, the inauguration of the Mahinda Rajapaksa International Sports Complex on Thursday was a tailor-made campaign event. More

SMH – Sri Lankan poll my be decided by Tamil vote

by Matt Wade

THE chopper overhead announced that the President had arrived. A packed stadium at Homagama in south-western Sri Lanka erupted as the country’s supremo, Mahinda Rajapaksa, did a flypast before landing.

Dressed in his trademark white tunic, sarong and red scarf, he was soon on the dais ready to open the new sports ground – named after himself.

With presidential elections next Tuesday, Thursday’s inauguration of the Mahinda Rajapaksa International Sports Complex was a tailor-made campaign event. More

SMH – Sri Lankan general woos Tamils in election challenge to President

by Matt Wade

Two months ago, Sarath Fonseka commanded one of the world’s most experienced armies. Now he is giving the Sri Lankan President, Mahinda Rajapaksa, a run for the top civilian post.

General Fonseka, 59, the former chief of the army, seems to have made this rapid transformation from military leader to presidential candidate with ease. His popularity among the urban middle class was on show at a political rally in Colombo on Wednesday night.

Two large portraits of the general flanked the stage: in one he was dressed in full uniform, in the other he wore a traditional white tunic buttoned to the neck. More

Asian Times – The gloves are off in Sri Lanka’s election

by Sudha Ramachandran

With Sri Lankans going to the polls on January 26 to elect their next president, there is considerable apprehension that polling will be neither free nor fair. The run-up to polling day has been violent, with five people killed in poll-related violence and scores injured.

The election monitoring group, People’s Action for Free and Fair Elections, has recorded 382 confirmed instances of violation of election laws between November 17, when candidates filed nominations, and January 20.

Supporters of the ruling party and the opposition are “aggressively moving towards a violent election”, a spokesperson of the Campaign for Free and Fair Elections told the BBC. “The remainder of the election campaign and the presidential election itself will not be conducted according to the legal procedures and limitations established by the constitution and the law,” the Colombo-based Center for Policy Analysis has warned. More

The Economist (21/01) – Between a rock and a hard man

Both candidates are ignoring what should be their priority: national reconciliation

THE presidential election in Sri Lanka on January 26th should have been a cakewalk for the incumbent. Last May, when his government defeated the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, bringing an end to a bloody 26-year insurgency, President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s popularity among the island’s Sinhalese majority knew no bounds. As for the Tamil minority, thwarted of the independent homeland for which the Tigers had been fighting, it was, at just 12% of the 21m population, too small to sway an election. Yet, as an ugly and at times violent election season nears its end, the outcome is now on a knife-edge. Despite the advantages of incumbency—such as fawning state-controlled media—the main challenger, Sarath Fonseka, might yet sneak home. Whoever wins, the prospects for a decent settlement for the Tamils, most of whom shunned the Tigers but nurture legitimate grievances, seem remote. More

The Economist (21/01) - Next year in Jaffna

Tamil émigrés follow the election campaign with jaundiced eyes

IN THE dingy back office of a Sri Lankan grocery shop in Harrow, north-west London, sales assistants pore over a Tamil newspaper, while a customer says he is going home to follow events on the internet. Having watched from afar as the Sri Lankan army crushed the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam in 2009, British Tamils are again transfixed by a campaign on the island—this time for an election. On January 26th the president, Mahinda Rajapaksa, will seek to capitalise on his military victory at a presidential poll called nearly two years earlier than it need have been.

The news, however, has been mostly grim for the 1m or so members of the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora. Most supported the rebels and the independent state for which they battled. As the Tigers were defeated, thousands of Tamils were killed. Now, the choice is between two candidates: Mr Rajapaksa, who launched the final bloody phase of the war; and Sarath Fonseka, who led the army that waged it.

For Tamils that constitutes a dispiriting contest. Both candidates are Sinhalese nationalists; neither seems likely to hurry towards the national reconciliation they have promised. But with the Sinhalese vote apparently closely split between Mr Rajapaksa and Mr Fonseka, Tamils, who constitute only 12% of the population, may have the deciding say. In Sri Lanka the Tamil National Alliance, once seen as a proxy for the Tigers, has announced its backing for Mr Fonseka, as the only way to thwart Mr Rajapaksa. Many Tamil émigrés say they grudgingly support that decision. Without votes, however, they can do little to sway the outcome. More

Associated Press (21/01) – Media Group sees bias in Sri Lanka poll coverage

A media rights group has accused Sri Lanka’s president of using government resources for his election campaign.

Reporters Without Borders said Thursday the main challenger to President Mahinda Rajapaksa is getting almost no air time in state media. It also said the telecoms regulator ordered mobile phone operators to issue a text message on behalf of the president.

Rajapaksa’s main challenger in the Jan. 26 election is former army chief Sarath Fonseka.

Both men are at the height of their popularity for ending the 25-year civil war last May against the Tamil Tigers. They are locked in a bitter and close election race.

A spokesman for Rajapaksa said the group’s statement went beyond its mandate and was not worth responding to.

BBC (21/01) – Shattered Tamil city braces for crucial poll

by Charles Haviland

The fishing boats seem to chase each other out in the lagoon. A flock of seabirds rises, glorious against the blue sky.

Calm has returned to Jaffna’s waters after decades of turbulence.

It is still a tense peace. The bay where they repair their boats is cordoned off, guarded by the military. Parts of the shore are lined with razor-wire.

But as the vessels crowd into the wharf by the fish market, there is a real buzz in the air.

The men weigh their crabs and cuttlefish, hack the big meaty fish into steaks, bargaining, bartering.

A young fisherman tells the BBC he is delighted with peace in the north. Restrictions have been lifted, he says: they can sail to more places; export their fish abroad; find more markets at home, too.

And he is enthusiastic about the 26 January election.

The two main candidates, President Mahinda Rajapaksa and the former army chief (and former northern commander), General Sarath Fonseka, are both widely viewed as hardline advocates for the island’s Sinhalese ethnic majority – people instrumental in vanquishing many Tamils’ desire for an autonomous homeland. More

MyNews – Sri Lanka: Democracy and truth were casualties of war

by Ameen Izzadeen

Sri Lanka-based senior journalist Ameen Izzadeen reports on Sri Lanka’s presidential battle, slated for January 26, in which the incumbent faces off a popular war hero.

In November 2009, when Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa officially declared his intention to seek a fresh mandate for another six-year term, he was getting ready for a one-horse race. A month and a half later, he is getting ready to fight his toughest political battle, which is being described as a neck-to-neck affair, after former army chief General Sarath Fonseka joined the presidential race.

Soon after the military victory over the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam in May last year, jubilant supporters predicted that Rajapaksa would remain the president of the island country for life. Some even called him Maha Rajanani (the great king). In fact, State-run television channels and radio stations regularly played a song that hailed him as the great king who united the country. The song was hurriedly filmed by his cronies weeks before the final victory. Rajapaksa basked in the glory of the victory and did not care to tell those who tried to make him a king that it was unconstitutional. More

15 JanSL Govt’s fakery & war crimes

Channel 4 World News Blog (08/01)- Will Sri Lanka cooperate with the UN’s experts

Jonathan Miller

Sri Lanka’s foreign minister is beginning to sound like a stuck record. Rohitha Bogollam continues to insist – as his government has done for four months – that the exection video is fake. The story, he still maintains, is “concocted”, the source “unreliable”, the footage “doctored” and the whole thing part of a “sinister” plot to besmirch Sri Lanka’s reputation.

The trouble is, his “unequivocal rejection” of the video’s authenticity now flies in the face of a growing body of independent expert opinion. The latest technical analyses, part of a UN inquiry, comprises reports from a forensic video analyst, a forensic pathologist and a firearms and ballistics expert.

In stark contrast to the findings of Sri Lankan experts, who in September claimed to have “scientifically established beyond doubt that this video is fake”, the experts commssioned by Philip Alston, the UN Special Rapporteur, believe the footage to be genuine. More

Times Online UK (08/01) – The battle for evidence of ‘war without witnesses’

by Catherine Philp

Accusations of fakery and political bias have been Sri Lanka’s stock in trade in the face of allegations of serious war crimes.

When The Times reported the estimated civilian death toll of 20,000, based on unofficial United Nations figures, the Government responded by claiming that not one non-combatant had perished. When The Times published aerial photographs that had been analysed by defence experts depicting how civilians were caught in government shelling, Colombo dismissed those images too as fakes.

The photographs were taken by a Times reporter and other journalists on Sri Lankan military helicopters flying the UN Secretary-General across the battle zone.

Sri Lanka’s campaign to wage a “war without witnesses” has meant that much of what has emerged about what happened has come from photographs, video and documents, as well as testimony from those trapped there. More

13 JanJustice for Lasantha?

The Canadian Press - Sri Lankan journalists demand justice for slain editor; no arrests a year after his killing

By Bharatha Mallawarachi

Sri Lankan journalists Tuesday demanded justice for a renowned newspaper editor gunned down by attackers on motorcycles, complaining no arrests have been made in the case a year after his killing.

Lasantha Wickrematunge, editor of The Sunday Leader newspaper, was shot dead in his car by assailants on Jan. 8, 2009. The paper had been critical of the government’s conduct in the war against the now-defeated Tamil Tiger rebels and reported on alleged human rights violations and government corruption.

Rights group Amnesty International has said at least 14 Sri Lankan journalists and media workers have been killed since the beginning of 2006, but none of these cases has been solved. Many have fled the country because of death threats. Some have been assaulted and others arrested. More

22 JulAP writer leaves Sri Lanka after visa not renewed

AP – AP writer leaves Sri Lanka after visa not renewed

The Associated Press bureau chief in Sri Lanka, who broke news of private U.N. reports outlining civilian death tolls, has been denied permission to remain in the country.

The AP’s Ravi Nessman left Sri Lanka on Monday after the government declined to renew his journalist’s visa.

The government denied that the decision was related to his reporting on the final throes of Sri Lanka’s quarter-century civil war with the Tamil Tiger rebels. The AP reported extensively on the heavy toll the war took on civilians as government forces surged across the rebels’ strongholds in the jungles of the north this year.

“We find this failure to renew Ravi’s visa disturbing,” said John Daniszewski, AP’s senior managing editor for international news.

Aside from reports on civilian casualties, Nessman revealed first word of a government document from January outlining a plan to keep hundreds of thousands of displaced people in camps for up to three years.

Nessman received a one-year journalist visa upon arriving in Sri Lanka in July 2007, and it was renewed the following year. The government declined to renew it for a third year.

Lucien Rajakarunanayake, director of international media in the office of President Mahinda Rajapaksa, insisted the government had not ousted Nessman. He said it was standard for foreign journalists to be based in Colombo for two years.

Nessman’s predecessor as AP bureau chief, Dilip Ganguly, was based in Colombo for a decade, from 1997-2007.

Both sides of Sri Lanka’s civil war have been accused by media groups of attempting to manipulate coverage.

The New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists said at least 11 Sri Lankan reporters were forced to flee the country in the past year, and Amnesty International said at least 14 Sri Lankan journalists and media workers have been killed since the beginning of 2006.

CPJ – AP bureau chief ordered out of Sri Lanka

Daily Mirror – AP Chief denied visa extension

International Press Institute – Sri Lanka Continues to Harrass and Intimidate Foreign, Domestic Media, Following End of Civil War

Reporters without Borders – Associated Press correspondent penalised for his war coverage