10 JunRajapakse is in India and so are the protesters & more

AFP – S.Lanka president’s India visit marred by protests

Sri Lanka’s President Mahinda Rajapakse on Wednesday began his first foreign trip to influential neighbour India since being re-elected, in a visit that has drawn protests from Indian Tamils.

NDTV -  Tamil issue to dominate Rajapakse’s India visit

CP – Tamil lawmaker urges Sri Lankan government to release innocent civilians accused of rebel ties

Ethnic Tamil lawmakers urged Sri Lanka’s government to free innocent people detained for months without trial over alleged links to the defeated Tamil Tiger rebels.

AFP -  Sri Lanka’s post-war boom accelerates

The Hindu -  Sri Lanka extends Emergency

South Asia Analyisis Group (7/06) – Historical Shift – India, Sri Lanka and the Tamils

Tags:

25 MaySri Lanka needs strong leadership

Groundviews : Sri Lanka after war: Where to now and how?

Great Expectations
The greatest challenge facing Sri Lanka is the quest for a just reconciliation to the ethnic issue through a democratic process coupled with a well planned economic strategy which will promote rapid development and equitably shared prosperity. The nation has stagnated in all respects as a consequence of the thirty year old ethnic conflict and now we need to fast track development. However, the negative trend of governance and increasingly adverse international reaction to it leaves little room for optimism in overcoming the numerous obstacles and challenges faced. Despite this, we need to keep hope alive to fulfill our dreams for a better Sri Lanka. More

18 AprTamil speaking Sinhala MP terrorised

Transcurrrents - Tamil goons of UPFA conduct terror campaign against TNA MP Piyasena

By D.B.S. Jeyaraj

Tamil goons of ruling UPFA conduct terror campaign against newly elected Tamil National Alliance MP from Amparai (Digamadulla.

Podiappuhamy Piyasena the Tamil speaking Sinhala MP from TNA is confined to “house arrest” due to threats and unable to move about freely.

In a pathetic interview to BBC Tamil service a terrified Piyasena said gangs had chopped at the doors of his house with axes to instill fear. More

16 AprHow safe Tamils in SL really are Kevin

NewMatilda – Has Life in Sri Lanka Really Normalised

by Samuel Thampapillai

Rudd has called a halt to the processing of asylum claims by Sri Lankans but there is still ample cause for Tamils to fear persecution, writes Samuel Thampapillai

Political alarm over the spike in boat people arrivals last week prompted the Rudd Government’s momentous announcement that they would suspend processing for Afghan and Sri Lankan asylum seekers.

The Government justified the halt in processing Sri Lankan asylum seekers on the grounds that the security situation in Sri Lanka is “normalising”. The implication was that things are getting so normal, Tamil fears of persecution should subside.

Nothing could be further from the truth. Post-conflict Sri Lanka is marked by a dangerous descent into authoritarianism. The end of the civil war has heralded a new phase of Tamil marginalisation. More

01 FebPhotos from Sri Lanka – New Matilda

New Matilda (28/01) – Scenes From The Sri Lankan Election Campaign

By Perambara

This week Sri Lanka made it to the end of a difficult and violent presidential election, shown in this series of photos from a local independent media service

On 26 January Sri Lanka held its first presidential election since the government of incumbent President Mahinda Rajapaksa declared that the war against Tamil separatists was over. The campaign was marred by widespread violence, and media coverage of it operated in the shadow of the ongoing intimidation and assassination of journalists. These images of the campaign are from independent Sri Lankan media organisation Perambara. More

08 JanThe candidates who destroyed the Tamils

Times Online – World Agenda: will the hammer of the Tamils nail the President?

A few weeks ago Sri Lanka’s upcoming general election looked like a walk in the park for the incumbent, President Rajapaksa, who was riding high on the kudos of ending the country’s long-running civil war.

The Australian - Sri Lankan poll ignites over Tamils

A FEW weeks ago, Sri Lanka’s upcoming general election looked like a walk in the park for the incumbent, President Mahinda Rajapaksa, who was riding high on the kudos of ending the country’s long-running civil war.

The Indpendent – Suren Surendiran: These candidates are largely to blame for destroying our people

As far as we Tamils are concerned, this is not the right time for any sort of election, regardless of who the candidates are. 

 Those in the traditional homeland are still recovering from the woes of the war; there has been no time for proper healing, rehabilitation or reconstruction. Most do not know where their loved ones are and whether they are still living or dead. They live in fear under a heavy military presence, with restricted freedom of movement.

07 JanUpdate on elections

Reuters - U.N. rejects request to observe Sri Lanka elections

The United Nations has turned down a request from Sri Lanka to send observers to monitor the country’s presidential election later this month because of lack of time, a U.N. spokesman said on Wednesday.

16 SepANALYSIS – Sri Lankan president's political-military shuffle

Reuters India

ANALYSIS – Sri Lankan president’s political-military shuffle

COLOMBO (Reuters) – To win a quarter-century war four of his predecessors could not, Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa did what none of them would: gave the military near-unlimited power.

But now that he has claimed victory over the Tamil Tiger rebels in one of Asia’s longest-running wars, Rajapaksa has moved quickly to diffuse the military’s influence as he eyes another term in office and rejuvenating the war-hit economy.

Analysts and officers say Rajapaksa is at once sharing the spoils of war and diffusing the military’s post-war power, ensuring there will be no threat to his plan to turn the war victory into an electoral one in a poll expected early next year.

Barely three months after the war ended, Rajapaksa promoted his war-winning army chief General Sarath Fonseka to a newly created post of Chief of Defence Staff (CDS), which many analysts saw as neutralising the wide powers Fonseka had in wartime.

“Fonseka was kicked upstairs to the ceremonial post before he will be made to retire,” said a serving military officer on condition of anonymity.

Rajapaksa also sent senior officers to foreign diplomatic postings or top civilian jobs and made Lt.-Gen. Jagath Jayasuriya, who won a reputation for professionalism when dealing with aid agencies during the war, the new commander.

A number of top officers are regular speakers at business leadership conferences in Colombo, imparting winning lessons.

From the time the war started in 1983 until Rajapaksa took office in 2006, it was an axiom of Sri Lankan political leadership that the military not be given too much power, lest it pose a coup threat.

“A military coup is not possible in Sri Lanka, but with over 100,000 in the force you can put pressure on the political system,” the officer said.

FAKE E-MAIL

Underscoring that reality, last month an e-mail circulated falsely attributed to Fonseka in which he declared his candidacy for president. The general quickly called it a hoax, and the government said it suspects an opposition hand in it.

Fonseka, nearly killed by a rebel suicide bombing in April 2006, engineered the successful war campaign and won it in a 34-month offensive. That garnered him and the military tremendous popularity.

Sri Lanka has never seen a top military leader enter politics, except for Major-General Janaka Perera. A popular member of the main opposition, Perera was killed by a suspected Tamil Tiger suicide bomber last year.

Fonseka, who on paper has oversight of the army, navy, and air force, in fact directly controls no troops and must clear all decisions with his former comrade-in-arms, Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa, a retired army colonel who is the president’s brother.

“The CDS position is overall a policy function and it is not a command function,” said Colonel R. Hariharan, a security analyst who headed military intelligence for the Indian Peacekeeping Force in Sri Lanka in 1987-1990.

Hariharan said the moves leave the president free to focus on politics and strengthening himself before a vote presidential allies say will happen around January, to be followed soon after by a parliamentary election.

SOLID VOTE

“The president wants to get a solid vote. I think he will put presidential polls first. So once the president comes with a big majority, it is psychologically an influence on the parliamentary polls,” Hariharan said.

Rajapaksa’s moves come as Sri Lanka’s $40 billion economy is showing a resurgence since the war ended on May 18 and now that a $2.6 billion International Monetary Fund loan has come through to cushion the war-ravaged economy, which was also hard hit by the global slowdown.

Since then, shares on the Colombo Stock Exchange have risen more than 48 percent, the central bank is holding the rupee steady, foreign exchange reserves have more than doubled to $4 billion, and tourist inflows have climbed every month.

Since the war’s end, Rajapaksa’s administration has been talking to investors directly and indirectly through central bank officials to persuade them to invest in Sri Lanka, amid a quiet intelligence war to nab remnant rebels and their international network.

Under the IMF loan, the government has agreed to cut its budget deficit to 5 percent in 2011 from 7.7 percent in 2008, and many economists say that could make it difficult for his government to maintain some of its populist measures and a top-heavy cabinet.

11 SepBan Ki Moon's connection to Rajapakse

Criticisms are being levelled from all quarters these days against UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon for not taking steps to halt the Sri Lankan (SL) war concluded recently. ‘The Economist’ magazine has declared that Ban Ki Moon’s popularity is on the decline day by day , based on an opinion poll , adding that, one of the reasons for this popularity wane is because Moon did not perform his duties duly during the SL war .The US New York Times newspaper during the last few days has also come down heavily on Ban Ki Moon against his course of action and for not taking measures to stop the war. It had been pointed out that Ban Ki Moon had not adopted adequate strategies and measures to stop the war. Although he tried to halt the war by his personal discussions with the SL Govt. , he did not sufficiently enlist the International community to bring enough pressure to bear on the SL Govt. overtly. He is also being castigated for his lukewarm attitude , having not made an announcement seriously critical of the SL Govt. and for not issuing a notice under his personal signature.

There are also charges against him that even though during the tail end of the war he was scheduled to visit SL , he had instead, sent his representative and divested himself of the responsibilities. This action has come under heavy fire . He has been blamed severely for sidelining his all important scheduled tour to SL during the critical final phase of the SL war.

Irrespective of whether there is any truth in the accusations, it is very clear that the SL Govt. had from the day of commencement of the war, made a right evaluation of the pressures Ban Ki Moon can exert on SL in connection with the war. The SL Govt. on the basis of this evaluation exploited its diplomacy to take measures to forestall and lighten the pressures of Ban Ki Moon. SL Govt. was clever in its manipulations.

Mahinda Rajapaksa knew Ban Ki Moon before the former became President of SL .During the time when voting was to take place to fill the vacancy of Secretary General of UN , there was a view that an Asian shall fill this vacancy. When it was decided that the UN General Secretary post shall be held by an Asian, the Asian countries forwarded the names of their candidates for the post.

South Korea proposed Ban Ki Moon who was a Foreign Minister of their country . SL too had the need to name a candidate for the UN Gen. Secretary post. SL proposed the name of Jayantha Dhanapala , a former High Commissioner who served in the UN Organization. When SL proposed Dhanapala’s name , S. Korea requested SL to get his name withdrawn, in which case, South Korea agreed to provide financial aid to SL .

At that time , the SL’s Foreign Minister Lakshman Kadirgamar’s perception was that SL will have to defray large sums of money if it is to contest the UN Gen. Secretary post ,and despite such expenditure , the chances of SL emerging victorious was slim. Therefore, for a poor country like SL , helping S. Korea’s candidate and reaping the financial benefits was a better option , he argued.

Dhanapala insisted that he could contest and win the UN Gen. Secretary post elections. He explained this to the SL President at that time Chandrika Kumaratunge. Mr. Dhanapala’s name was then proposed.

S. Korea representatives met Mahinda Rajapakse who was then the Prime Minster of SL. They requested him to get Dhanapala’s name withdrawn from the contest and support their candidate. It was at that time Mahinda Rajapakse and Ban Ki Moon came to know each other.

When Mahinda Rajapakse was becoming President , Dhanapala was SL’s candidate for the post of UN Gen. Secretary . But , when the UN Gen Secretary elections was drawing close , it was indicated that Dhanapala’s victory was a remote possibility. When Mahinda was extending support to Ban Ki Moon , he requested Dhanapala to withdraw from the contest. By that time, Dhanapala too had realized that he cannot win at the UN Gen. Secretary elections.

Mahinda Rajapakse took a wise decision at that juncture . He intuitively discerned that in the future , the UN Sec. General will be crucial to SL in decision making. Taking a farsighted decisions is what ‘Medamulana diplomacy’ means . If Dhanapala was to be kept in the contest, SL will have to spend large sums of money which would be of no avail as Dhanapala in any case would lose. Besides. Ban Ki Moon and S. Korea’s feelings would be hurt. Mahinda made a judicious move to convince Dhanapala of the actual situation.

For Ban Ki Moon , the decision taken by Mahinda Rajapaksa was unforgettable . This is why when the whole world was vehemently and vociferously protesting against the SL war , Ban Ki Moon took pains to discuss it with Mahinda on a personal level , and requested him to explore the possibility of halting the on going war. He avoided making bitter criticisms against the SL Govt. because he was averse to disrupting the cordial relations that existed between him and the SL Govt.

At the tail end of the war , when he was under intense pressure to visit SL , he sidelined it , and sent Nambiar as his representative. Nambiar’s brother was a former high ranking official of the Indian Army who had negotiated with the Tamil Tigers as India’s representative. However , he had no faith at all in the Tamil Tigers. If India’s former Chief had no trust at all in the Tamil Tigers , it is inconceivable that his brother , the UN representative will have faith in them.

The war ended when Nambiar was in SL. After the end of the war , when charges were brought before the UNHRC against SL , S. Korea ,the country to which UN Sec. General belonged opposed it. Then and only then , the Tamil Tigers would have realized what this Rajapaksa’s ‘ Meda mulana’ diplomacy had done . But , it was too late when that realization dawned on them , for by that time everything needed to be done for their devastation was done and finished.

02 SepTotalitarian leader was once a young idealist fighting for human rights

The Independent World

Totalitarian leader was once a young idealist fighting for human rights

President Rajapaksa’s treatment of the independent press is a shocking indictment of a regime that refuses to tolerate criticism, writes a Special Correspondent

Tuesday, 1 September 2009

“The creatures outside looked from pig to man and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which?”

– Animal Farm by George Orwell

Read full article here.